A More Personal Meaning of “Survival of the Fittest”

Typically, the phrase “survival of the fittest” is associated with Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. However, its true meaning often needs to be reviewed and understood better. This article will explore the genuine significance of “survival of the fittest” and shed light on its broader implications beyond biology.

Darwin’s Theory of Evolution:

To understand the true meaning of “survival of the fittest,” we must first delve into Darwin’s theory of evolution. Darwin argued that species undergo a process of natural selection, in which those with the most advantageous characteristics will more likely survive and reproduce, passing those traits on to their offspring. Over time, these favorable traits become more prevalent in a population, leading to the adaptation and evolution of species.

The Misconception of Strength and Power:

Contrary to popular belief, “survival of the fittest” does not imply that the strongest, richest, or most powerful individuals are guaranteed survival. Instead, “fitness” refers to an organism’s ability to adapt and thrive in its specific environment. Fitness encompasses a range of attributes, including physical traits, reproductive success, and adaptability to changing conditions.

While strengths and power are part of physical and emotional traits, they are only part of the equation. Too often, we oversimplify concepts for speed and convenience rather than genuinely wanting to study, discuss, and compromise on incremental improvements that will benefit the many.

Adaptability and Survival:

Survival in the context of “survival of the fittest” depends not solely on physical strength but on an organism’s ability to adapt to its environment. Also, there are many sub-strengths required for a species to adapt successfully. As humans, physical, emotional, intellectual, and monetary resources, political power, and societal forces must be considered.

Very often, we allow others with perceived strength, power, or money to dictate changes that are not focused on the positive adaptability of the whole population, and this is where we begin to have issues.

Any species that can adjust to new circumstances, such as changes in climate or the availability of resources, have a higher likelihood of survival. Adaptability involves traits such as intelligence, flexibility, and behavioral plasticity.

Cooperation and Social Dynamics:

Another important aspect often overlooked is the role of cooperation and social dynamics in species’ survival. Many organisms have evolved to thrive through collaboration and collective strategies. Cooperative behavior can provide advantages such as increased protection, efficient resource utilization, and improved chances of survival for the group.

In most cases, cooperation can outweigh individual competitive traits. Collaboration and cooperation are human survival techniques, as they are for many in the animal kingdom. However, humans can bring intelligence, compassion, and love in uniquely different ways. We have the power of choice; the key is using it when necessary.

Application beyond Biology:

While Darwin’s theory originated in the biological domain, the concept of “survival of the fittest” extends beyond the natural world. It finds relevance in various fields such as business, society, and personal development. In these contexts, “fitness” is adapting, innovating, and competing effectively in a given environment.

Some of these adaptations over the course of history have been good, while others have resulted in terrible atrocities. For example, British scientist Francis Galton coined the term eugenics (derived from the Greek for “well-born”) and established the Eugenics Education Society of London in 1907. Galton and many other educated elitists hoped to actively discourage the overbreeding of the less fit from expanding and ensuring that the Victorian elements grew.

All one needs to understand about the extreme application of this statement in society is to read “Mein Kampf” by Adolph Hitler. He espoused the drive of the fitter to overpower the less fit in his culture.

Business and Innovation:

In the business world, the principle of “survival of the fittest” is evident in the fierce competition among companies. Adaptability, innovation, and the ability to meet changing consumer demands are critical for a company’s long-term survival. Businesses that fail to evolve and embrace new technologies and market trends often get left behind.

Having spent 50+ years in business management, I have seen that ignoring this particular idea of adaptability costs many businesses market share and profit and eventually drops their brand into obscurity.

Societal Implications:

On a broader scale, the principle of “survival of the fittest” has influenced societal structures and dynamics throughout history. Societies that can adapt to changing circumstances, address the needs of their members, and promote cooperation tend to thrive. Additionally, advancements in fields such as medicine and technology contribute to a society’s overall fitness and well-being when applied for the benefit of all rather than manipulated to benefit the few.

Today, my biggest fear is not that technology will make humans extinct but rather that humans acting in selfish and draconian ways will lead people to extinction while trying to blame everything and everyone else. Too many people today want to be told what to do and what to think rather than ask questions and challenge processes in the search for improvements for everyone.

It’s easy to shut the door and hide behind a curtain of misinformation, but eventually, an implosion will shatter everything from every direction.

Summary:

“Survival of the fittest” encapsulates the ideal that adaptability, rather than sheer strength or power, is crucial for survival and success. While it has its roots in biology, the concept applies to various domains, emphasizing the importance of adaptation, cooperation, and innovation. Understanding its true meaning allows us to appreciate the complexity of evolutionary processes and apply its principles to our own lives and endeavors. If, and only if, we are willing to discuss, tolerate and cooperate for the success of humanity. Yes, humans can solve the world’s problems if we can only begin understanding the necessity of adaptation, logical use, practical discussion, trust, and collaboration.

We need to stop demanding immediate solutions to problems whose future repercussions are more damaging than the situations they solved. We need to think holistically and with compassion for others. To all leaders, lead properly, honestly, transparently, with competency and humanity, or get out of the way. Sooner or later, those being taken advantage of will demand compensation for all the mistreatment, and I don’t want to be around when that happens. The time for change is now.